Leesburg Council Chastised by Dunn Critics

One day after a majority of the Leesburg Town Council declined to discuss the merits of a formal censure of Councilman Tom Dunn, they faced heated criticism on Tuesday from community members and groups.

Representatives of the gun control group Moms Demand Action, the LGBTQ community and the Loudoun County NAACP skewered some council members over their response to, or role in, Dunn’s recent choice to write statements rather than sign his name on town proclamations supporting their projects. Critics, including some council colleagues, have called on Dunn to resign over his actions.

Dunn was accused of violating the Town Council’s Code of Ethics by writing messages on his signature line on ceremonial proclamations marking Gun Violence Awareness Day, Pride Month, and Juneteenth.

The heated comments came after Councilman Ron Campbell on Monday night did not find enough support to consider a censure vote against Dunn.

Campbell sought to add a censure motion to Tuesday night’s meeting agenda, but his request was supported only by Vice Mayor Marty Martinez and Councilman Neil Steinberg. The three have all publicly called for Dunn to resign over his actions, which Dunn has stated he has no intention of doing. On Tuesday, several of Dunn’s critics chastised Burk for not voting to support the agenda item.

Loudoun County NAACP President Pastor Michelle C. Thomas pointed to a quote by Martin Luther King Jr., that those who ignore evil are accomplices to it. She turned her attention in particular to Dunn, Mayor Kelly Burk and Councilman Joshua Thiel. She criticized Thiel both for his decision to sign Dunn’s statement to the Pride Month proclamation at his request, since Dunn was absent when the proclamation was signed, and also for not supporting review of the town’s ethics policy during Monday night’s work session. That discussion will occur at a future work session instead.

Councilman Ron Campbell first raised the idea of discussing the ethics policy and also put forward two unsuccessful motions to consider censure of Dunn either Tuesday or at a future meeting.

Thomas also criticized Burk for not supporting a vote to censure Dunn and promised to lead an effort to recall her from office.

“I guess it was random to decide not to give us a voice, to lynch our voices. What will not be random is my effort to recall you as mayor,” she said in addressing Burk.

Thomas said Dunn had normalized disappointment in Leesburg and had taken bigotry to a new level.

Town resident Mary Katherine Bennett presented her own proclamation to the council during the petitioner’s section of the meeting. She called for the creation of “Stand up to Bullies Day” on June 14, the same day the NAACP held a press conference calling for Dunn’s resignation.

Charlotte McConnell of the Equality Loudoun Steering Committee called for the resignations of both Dunn and Thiel. She said that official town documents are not the place for personal opinions.

But some in the audience said the Town Council should not ignore freedom of speech and defended Dunn’s actions.

Former town resident Sandy Kane said she was “appalled that the Town Council could be railroaded by the NAACP.”

“Tom Dunn, whether you agree with what he has to say, has a right to his opinion as the rest of you do. For years he has been voted into that position on the Town Council,” she said.

Harold Brown, in what was perhaps the most tense exchange, called the NAACP “race baiters” and said the Town Council should not bend to them.

“Any of you who knuckle under to the NAACP or any one of these Mickey Mouse organizations should be ashamed of yourselves,” he said. Several members of the audience claimed that Brown made an obscene gesture to them after finishing his remarks, to which Burk asked him to be respectful of his behavior or be asked to leave the Council Chambers.

While a censure may not happen, there was enough support on the town council for a motion by Councilwoman Suzanne Fox to talk about the council’s ethics policy at a future meeting.

Tuesday’s meeting was preceded by a protest on the town green led by Equality Loudoun.

“This isn’t a difference of opinion,” McConnell said. “This is about respect. This is about following your own ethics policy.”

On the town proclamation marking June as Pride Month, Dunn, who was absent, asked Thiel to write “everyone is equal. Identities don’t help,” which Thiel did.

“Who here thinks everyone is equal?” McConnell said. “No, we live in a very unequal society. We do aspire to equality, but we have a long road ahead of us.”

During Tuesday’s protest, Burk took to the stage to defend her votes.

“I want you to know that I’m with you, I stand with you, and I believe in what you believe in, it’s very important to me,” Burk said. “But there’s a role that you have play as mayor, and part of that role requires that you follow rules, and sometimes that trips up the end product.”

She said she could not support Campbell’s second and third motions because they were “too vague,” but that if he brings the topic up again in the future, “I will be with him and support him in that.”

“It was inappropriate, it was mean, and it was very selfish of him and it was embarrassing for us as a town council to do that,” Burk said of Dunn’s actions. And she said while the council cannot force Dunn to resign, those at the protest can make him “uncomfortable.”

Martinez invited those at the protest to do just that.

“I would like to see you show up at every council meeting and tell us your stories, to hear what you have had to go through, to understand the discrimination, the horrors of what happens to some of our LGBTQ, especially transgender women,” Martinez said.

Before adjourning the meeting, several council members weighed in on the events of the past several weeks, and looked forward to reviewing the ethics policy.

“The wording of the code of ethics is not definitive, and is open to interpretation, which is why we need, and I asked for, the discussion to make the code definitive,” Councilwoman Suzanne Fox said.

Although there was no further talk of voting for censure at Tuesday’s meeting, Fox made her feelings known.

“No one should have to live in constant fear that if they come to the wrong conclusion, or do something someone else does not approve of, that censure is around the corner. We can’t operate that way as a body,” she said.

Dunn clarified his intent with the statements he wrote on the three proclamations, and said his intention was not to offend.

“For those people who find harm in the statements I made I truly regret that; that was not my intention,” he said.

Dunn also said he hoped the council could work toward unity, and not division. He criticized the June 14 press conference organized by the NAACP as an attempt “to make a show” and divide the community

Campbell also stressed a need to unite the community.

“Moving forward I think there is some damage control [to be done], a loss of trust in this community,” he said.

krodriguez@loudounnow.com

8 thoughts on “Leesburg Council Chastised by Dunn Critics

  • 2019-06-26 at 10:43 am
    Permalink

    Ah yes, the Left on full display: Threatening. Demanding. Requiring all people toe their party line via creepy group think, or else. Creating hostile work environments, and suppressing the free speech of others.

    • 2019-06-26 at 11:04 pm
      Permalink

      Chris, where was the Threatening? Councilman Dunn had another Councilman (Josh Thiel) write a comment where his signature should have been(this was against the rules). No threat here. It was a breach of rules and ethics.

  • 2019-06-26 at 3:29 pm
    Permalink

    This is not a free speech issue. Councilmember Dunn is free to have as many opinions as he wants to. This is about defacing Town proclamations. Leave your signature line blank if you want to; leave your name completely off of it if you want to; but don’t show a complete lack of professionalism by scrawling remarks on a document that honors many, and will be honored by many.

  • 2019-06-26 at 4:10 pm
    Permalink

    Why can’t elected officals just do their job? Fix potholes, plan roads and build parks, etc. If there is some “Resolution” you don’t like, you vote against it or abstain. You do not write some sort of gospel lesson. Save that for the pulpit Sunday. How utterly dumb. Pretty much my view of most local government.

  • 2019-06-26 at 6:08 pm
    Permalink

    Typical liberal actions, but the Virginia Democrat party is lead by racist Governor Northam, racist Attorneys General Herring and alleged rapist Lt. Governor Fairfax. The 3 stooges of the Commonwealth! These leaders are low character people, so don’t expect the followers to be different.

  • 2019-06-26 at 11:02 pm
    Permalink

    There is a reason we have rules in our society and government. Councilman Dunn knew the rules but chose to ignore them and “send a message” by having another member of council (Josh Thiel) write a comment on the proclamation where a signature was required. He could have chosen not to sign it but did not.This was not the first time either. He should be censured. Those who wrote (without using their real name) that council should only worry about picking up trash and fixing roads, I say that council (our leaders who should set the example, should also be in the business of commending groups and people and encouraging “Liberty and Justice for ALL”

  • 2019-06-27 at 11:59 am
    Permalink

    Mr, F”

    “What will not be random is my effort to recall you as mayor,” she said in addressing Burk.” Just because the mayor didn’t vote a certain way on a goofy move by Campbell, she’s threatened with recall? The leftists group think was disrupted, therefore she must go? These people are crazy train.

    But of course, Kelly falls right into the threat game herself by encouraging a hostile work environment; “And she said while the council cannot force Dunn to resign, those at the protest can make him “uncomfortable.”

    Councilwoman Fox makes a completely reasonable and correct point. “No one should have to live in constant fear that if they come to the wrong conclusion, or do something someone else does not approve of, that censure is around the corner. We can’t operate that way as a body,” she said.”

    The left Mr. F… ‘Vote like us, think like us, and hate like us, or we’ll destroy you.’ That’s how they’ve been historically, and for some reason today, they feel entitled to control the thoughts and actions of other individuals, through bullying, intimidation, and by creating hostile work environments.
    There’s your threats Mr. F.

  • 2019-06-30 at 6:45 pm
    Permalink

    This is not the first time that Tom Dunn has stepped in it. Also, Ms. Fox is not correct in her statement. The People have the right to recall an elected official, when they do not agree with what that elected official is doing. It would appear that Ms. Fox believes that once elected, she is immune from criticism for how she conducts herself as an elected official. And what Tom Dunn and Mr. Theil did, was deface public documents. That is something that deserves censure. If Ms. Fox cannot understand that, that very much calls into question her understanding of what an elected official is.

Leave a Reply