Gun Laws, Driver Privilege Cards Dominate Town Hall

State Sen. Jennifer B. Boysko (D-33) and Del. Wendy W. Gooditis (D-10) came back from Richmond for a standing-room-only town hall in Leesburg Saturday, Jan. 25, one which was mostly dominated by talk about

proposed new gun laws and a proposed driver privilege card.

Both sides of the Leesburg Town Council chamber were packed with people—on one side, holding signs in support of creating a driver privilege card conferring the same privileges as a typical driver’s license and requiring the same driving exam, but which does not function as a voter ID.

On the other side and throughout the room, people had come to speak against new gun laws moving through the General Assembly this year. Retired law enforcement officer Mike Taylor said, like many retiring cops, he bought his service weapon upon retiring.

“The laws that you are proposing passing are going to make my firearm an assault weapon… So you’re going to make me a felon for carrying the firearm that I carried for 26 years on the job,” Taylor said. He also said he has twice had to evacuate his family due to threats from a person he arrested: “If this idiot red flags me, you’ve taken away the ability for me and my family to protect our home, and again, I become another criminal, you subjugate my rights.”

Two laws in particular have drawn the ire of guns rights activists this year. One would expand the definition of an “assault firearm” under state law and makes it a Class 6 felony to import, sell, transfer, manufacture, purchase, possess or transport one.

The bill would define an assault firearm as a semi-automatic pistol or rifle with a fixed magazine capacity of more than 10 rounds, or that accepts a detachable magazine, and that meets one of a number of other characteristics, such as a folding stock, grenade launcher, or silencer. It also makes it a misdemeanor to import or sell any magazine designed to hold more than 10 rounds.

The senate version of that bill died in committee, removed at the request of its patron; the House version remains in committee.

Another bill, proposing a “red flag” law, would allow law enforcement to temporarily take firearms from a person deemed a threat to themselves or others. A commonwealth’s attorney or law-enforcement officer would apply to a judge or magistrate for an emergency order allowing a warrant to confiscate the guns; a circuit court hearing would be required within 14 days. That bill has passed the Senate, 21-19, a party-line vote.

Opponents of those bills say they take away people’s Second Amendment rights without due process. Mike De La Crus presented Boysko and Gooditis with another red flag—the flag of the former Soviet Union.

“I do hope you enjoy hanging them in your offices or displaying them with pride, because this is scary, this is what this will take our country to,” De La Cruz said.

Mike De La Cruz displays a flag of the former Soviet Union at a town hall in Leesburg Saturday, Jan. 25. [Renss Greene/Loudoun Now]

And other warned of violent resistance to the law.

“What I’m really worried about is the immoral use of force where you’re sending a law enforcement officer to take a gun from someone who’s never been convicted of a crime, not once, they never had their day in court,” said one person. “And you’re going to risk them getting shot, because I don’t know about you, but I am not going to comply, and I think most Virginians aren’t going to comply.”

But the bills’ supporters, including Boysko and Gooditis, say they’re about keeping people safe. Gooditis told a story that she told often on the campaign trail, about her brother, who suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder after being sexually abused as a child. She said that one time, her parents called police to their house, where her brother was living, because he was drinking and threatening suicide.
“The deputies spent an hour with him, talking him down,” Gooditis said. “At the end of that hour they gave the firearm back, because that’s the law. And yes, my brother shot himself with that firearm. Red flag laws have more to do with protecting people who are suicidal, and they are effective in the states that have passed them for this reason.”

“We will continue this conversation for many months, I’m certain,” Boysko said. “I promise you that I will continue to dialogue with you. I may not agree with you, I may come down on the other side, but I will always respect your right to have the conversation and share with me.”

7 thoughts on “Gun Laws, Driver Privilege Cards Dominate Town Hall

  • 2020-01-27 at 6:11 pm
    Permalink

    I attended the Town Hall and was very unimpressed. It appears that Jennifer Boysko wants to be a Senator for the sole purpose of advocating transgender legislation and Wendy Gooditis wants to be a Delegate so that she can constantly keep giving us her ever-changing story about her brother’s suicide. I have heard Gooditis give three different versions on that sad family story. It is a real shame that the Town of Leesburg is represented by these two.

    • 2020-02-07 at 10:11 am
      Permalink

      She is essentially blaming guns for her brother’s mental illness. Instead of tackling the actual problem they are trying to blame it on a tool. A co-worker of mine hung himself in the basement of his house after his wife, suffering from Alzheimer, totally forgot who he was. If someone wants to take their own life there is many other ways to do it. Take Japan for example, where guns a prohibited, thousands visit Mount Fuji just to take their own lives. It’s like trying to treat alcoholism by taking away his/her car.

  • 2020-01-27 at 8:48 pm
    Permalink

    The purpose of a government ID is to prove the identity of the document holder. If someone magically appears in a jurisdiction claiming to be someone, but cannot substantiate his claims, then the government must not further the charade. What is to stop someone from getting multiple identification cards from multiple jurisdictions and switching identities at convenience? How can a bank or insurance company trust any identification from anyone at this point?

    I’ve lived abroad in several different countries spanning more than a decade. I assure you my undocumented presence in any of those countries would have quickly resulted in my detention and removal. I can’t think of a single exception. I never thought those nations racist for enforcing their immigration laws though sometimes personally inconvenient.

    We need to know who is in our community and under what circumstances to keep society functioning properly.

    • 2020-02-07 at 10:18 am
      Permalink

      I’ve already heard that there are illegal alien that have multiple driver’s licenses from CA with the same photo but with different names on each one. I assume this illegal alien can also vote multiple times with those IDs.

  • 2020-02-07 at 10:30 am
    Permalink

    Bottom line is, according to these politicians, if you belong to one of the fringe minority group or if you’re an illegal alien, you get more rights then regular citizens. People need to vote them out before you lose all your rights. If you don’t want men letting it all hang out in a women’s locker room, if you want to be able to own a gun to defend yourself or your family, you need to vote these radicals out. I am not against anyone as long as my rights are not violated. My little girl or my wife should not have to share a bathroom with a biological man, with all his man parts intact, just because he identify as a woman.

  • 2020-02-16 at 4:49 pm
    Permalink

    She said she would not vote for a ban on so called assault weapons. We will see with Monday’s vote.

  • 2020-02-18 at 5:01 am
    Permalink

    Boysko screwed the pooch with her vote on House Bill 961. She told us point blank she would not vote for an assault gun ban, she lied to everyone who attended her town hall recently. There is a video of her stating her intention, yikes!

Leave a Reply