Loudoun Supervisors Move Toward Admissions, Cigarette, Plastic Bag Taxes

County supervisors took steps toward enacting three new local taxes at their Nov. 17 meeting, including taxes on admissions, cigarettes, and single-use plastic bags.

The county will seek to join the Northern Virginia Cigarette Tax Board, which would allow Loudoun to levy a tax of two cents per cigarette, or 40 cents a pack. The towns of Hillsboro, Leesburg, Lovettsville, Middleburg, Purcellville, and Round Hill are already members.

Supervisors are after not only the estimated $2.4 million in revenue, but the discouraging effect on smoking that taxes have been shown to have. Some of those studies were cited in the staff report provided to supervisors.

“Nicotine is an incredibly dangerous drug, and it costs a lot of money when you smoke and have all the other medical problems that come with it down the line,” said County Chair Phyllis J. Randall (D-At Large). “If I could, I would double the price of cigarettes. I would price cigarettes so high no one would ever smoke again if I could. I’ll take 40 cents, but I gotta tell you, this tax right here saves lives, and there’s not too many times you can actually say that a tax on anything literally saves lives.”

“I am adamantly opposed to smoking, I’m just not sure that raising taxes on cigarettes is going to make a difference in how many people smoke,” said Supervisor Tony R. Buffington (R-Blue Ridge).

“I’m not sure if the correct policy process is, we impose taxes on people because we want to control their behavior,” said Supervisor Caleb A. Kershner (R-Catoctin). “That’s really not the purpose behind our ability to tax.”

Randall called those arguments “baffling.”

“It will save hundreds of millions of dollars if we decrease the amount of smoking,” Randall said. “If you are fiscally conservative, this is the most fiscally conservative thing you could possibly do. And honestly, if you are pro-life, because of how much damage it does to babies in utero, this is the most pro-life thing you can do.”

Supervisors voted to petition the Northern Virginia Cigarette Tax Board for membership on a 6-2-1 vote, with Buffington and Kershner opposed and Supervisor Matthew F. Letourneau (R-Dulles) absent.

The possible new taxes on tickets and plastic bags were both prompted by new local authorities granted by the General Assembly, with the admissions tax having been on the county’s legislative agenda for the state after announcing the deal to bring Loudoun United and Segra Field to Philip A. Bolen Memorial Park near Leesburg.

But with that new authority granted this year, supervisors are now seeking to limit it to professional sporting events rather than taxing events generally. Supervisors voted 8-0-1, with Supervisor Matthew F. Letourneau (R-Dulles) absent, to ask Attorney General Mark Herring whether localities have the authority to make that distinction.

The General Assembly also this year granted localities the power to levy a 5-cent tax on single-use plastic bags, but supervisors don’t plan to use that power until at least January 2022, when the country is hoped to be clear of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“If you do the stream cleaning in your neighborhood, which a few of us up here that I know of personally have done over the years, you’re going to see nothing but plastic bags in those streams and ponds and whatnot, so this is a way to prevent that from happening,” said Vice Chairman Koran T. Saines (D-Sterling).

Retailers keep a portion of the tax. The tax is expected to bring in $430,000 in the first year, increasing to $570,000 over the next two years as retailers keep a smaller portion of tax revenues.

By state law, revenues from the plastic bag tax must be used for cleaning the environment, providing education programs designed to reduce environmental waste, mitigating pollution and litter, or providing reusable bags to recipients of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Women, Infants, and Children benefits. According to a staff report, Loudoun’s government would likely use the money for community clean-up events and special recycling events.

Supervisors voted 6-2-1 to set the county staff to work implementing that tax, with Supervisors Tony R. Buffington (R-Blue Ridge) and Caleb A. Kershner (R-Catoctin) opposed.

rgreene@loudounnow.com

10 thoughts on “Loudoun Supervisors Move Toward Admissions, Cigarette, Plastic Bag Taxes

  • 2020-11-24 at 1:52 pm
    Permalink

    Hang on to your wallets Loudoun residents!

    “…….And honestly, if you are pro-life, because of how much damage it does to babies in utero, this is the most pro-life thing you can do.”

    Says our esteemed BOS Chair who supports the governor that is all in with delivering a full term baby and aborting in AFTER birth.

    Randalls hypocrisy is appalling.

    • 2020-11-24 at 3:45 pm
      Permalink

      I wish Randall cared more about dead babies than smokers.

  • 2020-11-24 at 3:43 pm
    Permalink

    The BoS now receives an additional $400M/year from data centers that it didn’t have a decade ago. Yet, that still isn’t enough money to satisfy these greedy, avaricious Democrats. They need to steal and spend even more of your money.

  • 2020-11-24 at 3:55 pm
    Permalink

    Once again Leadership giving “health” advice to increase taxes! And what about the BS admission tax! Even the plastic bag tax… if the county is using that extra income to actually clean up then OK, most of it is currently done through volunteers, so what is the tax actually for? How about a power consumption tax, and environmental impact tax, to pay for the effects of all of the data centers?

    • 2020-11-24 at 4:27 pm
      Permalink

      Dang DT! Don’t give these grifters any ideas. You’re so right; We get to pay a tax, to attend a 50 million tax dollar facility that was so great, so fantastic, it was done in secret, and nobody got a chance to vote for. Best part… the corporate team gets a cut of the tax!

  • 2020-11-24 at 4:03 pm
    Permalink

    Can we bring our own plastic bags and not be charged?

  • 2020-11-24 at 4:19 pm
    Permalink

    “I would price cigarettes so high no one would ever smoke again if I could.” Ah yes. Who doesn’t want Phyllis deciding personal choices for other people?

    I got a U.S. Grant that says Phyllis supports Gov. Infanticide’s efforts on smoking weed for everybody.

    • 2020-11-24 at 5:11 pm
      Permalink

      No, no…. you simply don’t understand….
      The smoke from marijuana *ISN’T* unhealthy. In any way, shape or form. In fact, it fosters good health. Good life decisions. And even acts as a great motivator.

  • 2020-11-24 at 6:05 pm
    Permalink

    Amazing, we are in a business many people and small businesses are having a hard time making it and Phyllis & Company pass more taxes. Soon the board will hear how difficult it is for teachers, police officers, fire fighters/EMS to live here and rather than making it more affordable the BOS passes more taxes. Clearly the pandemic has not reached the BOS perhaps they should work for free and allow us taxpayers to forgo new taxes.

  • 2020-11-25 at 7:46 am
    Permalink

    I applaud the inclusion of a cigarette tax for the reason not mentioned in the article. It takes away the incentive for people who want to buy cigarettes in Loudoun towns and Leesburg from traveling outside those towns and Leesburg to buy their smokes. This keeps more income in the urban areas and less traffic. Did the BOS even think of that or are they really entrenched in social issues. All single use plastics should be avoided not just bags. Maybe if the rule was changed to retailers had to pay customers to accept paper paper bags it would make more sense. If the BOS really needs money then why don’t they stop waiving the property tax worth millions from Howard Hughes in Ashburn? If they really want to impress voters why not publish their top ten problems they will endeavor to resolve over the next 3 years instead of lurching from one social, tabloid quality issue to another. 🙂

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: