As Students Return to Classrooms, School Board Again Under Fire

For a year, Loudoun’s School Board meeting room has been a battleground for parents pushing for students to return to the classroom, as division leaders were paralyzed by often conflicting guidance provided by local administrators and state and federal authorities. 

Just as schools appear to be on a road to a full return, a new fight has erupted, with some of those same parents remaining on the frontlines—and perhaps in the crosshairs of they are criticizing.

The publication last week of a report by conservative news site The Daily Wire detailed the efforts by participants in a closed Facebook group, including six School Board members and other local elected representatives and educators among its 624 members, to identify and take action against critics of the school closures and the division’s equity initiatives. The article detailed allegations that members of the “Anti-Racist Parents of Loudoun County” groupcollected and disseminated critics’ personal information and considered hacking into their websites, resulting in requests to the Sheriff’s Office to determine whether criminal conduct occurred. 

The controversy put a new spotlight on the school division’s efforts to address allegations of discrimination and its implementation of new equity awareness training that highlights concepts of white privilege and systemic racism. The school division launched the anti-racism initiative two years ago in response to mounting examples of racially insensitive instruction, instances of racism among students or staff members, a disproportionately low number of Black and Latinx student gaining admission to the division’s STEM academies, and a Virginia Attorney General’s Office investigation into allegations of systemic racism in the division, which earlier this year resulted in a formal agreement mandating corrective actions.

Interim Superintendent Scott A. Ziegler on March 19 issued a statement to refute claims that the division was instituting controversial critical race theory curriculum and “to clarify many of the misperceptions being reported by certain media outlets and social media.”

“In explaining LCPS’ equity priorities, it might be helpful to state what they are not. They are not an effort to indoctrinate students and staff into a particular philosophy or theory. What they are is an effort to provide a welcoming, inclusive, affirming environment for all students,” he wrote.

“LCPS’ work on equity is a journey that requires the commitment of staff at all levels. I feel the staffs’ work, which has been sustained, honest and undertaken in good faith, has been misrepresented recently by some members of the public,” he wrote.

However, for the second consecutive board meeting, a teacher addressed raised concerns to the board about the equity training the staff is required to complete. 

“You are about to experience a mass exodus of teachers and staff here in Loudoun County. It has already started, and I hope you pay attention to the numbers,” Jeremy Wright said. “CRT is divisive. There are racial comments that are made during these trainings and when this happens, it opens you up to litigation.”

“Minority students are going to suffer the most from this. When you teach students that the system is against them, they have no motivation to learn. They are not going to try to work. They are not going to try to improve themselves,” he said.

Ziegler’s statement also addressed the allegation that school employees were engaged in the punishing of critics. “LCPS recognizes the right of its employees to free speech, but does not condone anyone targeting members of the community for their viewpoint.”

The reported activity of the Facebook group spurred new calls for School Board members to be removed from office.

Beth Barts (Leesburg) was the only School Board member identified as being actively involved with the group. She already has been censured by the board and removed from all committee assignments for online postings deemed to violate the board’s conduct policies. A group of parents previously announced plans to mount a formal recall campaign seeking her removal.

On Tuesday, a new group, Loudoun Parents for Education, announced plans to petition for the recall not just of Barts, but also the other five board members identified as being members of the Facebook group—School Board Chairwoman Brenda Sheridan (Sterling), Vice Chairwoman Atoosa Reeser (Algonkian), Leslee King (Broad Run), Denise Corbo (At Large), and Ian Serotkin (Blue Ridge).

Spokesman Ian Prior said the board has spent much of its time since the 2019 elections focused on divisive actions and has strayed from its core educational duties. 

“In 2019 when the elections for Loudoun County School Board were held, the pandemic and curriculum issues that are dividing this community were not a major point of discussion, but they clearly have become so,” he said. “Further, six of the nine school board members were part of a private Facebook group where members were conspiring to commit potentially illegal actions against members of the community for exercising their First Amendment rights to speak out against the curriculum and for opening schools.”

During Tuesday night’s School Board meetings, several individuals who found their names on the group’s list of critics spoke out.

“I was personally attacked. My name, my first name, my last name, where my son goes to school, who my husband is, where I live and three pictures of me were all on that Facebook page,” Patti Menders said. “They wanted to send postcards to our neighbors calling us racist and come to our home with a megaphone and call us racists. And Beth Barts, you incited this mob. I blame you for these people, including teachers, to come after us because we have different opposing views.”

“At what point did our School Board members go from serving residents to targeting them?” asked Cheryl Onderchain, who said she now worried about having rocks thrown through her windows and having her children targeted at school. 

“A list like this puts a target on me. It puts a target on my family and 40 other families. Think of what a zealot could do with this list,” Austin Levine said.

The School Board met in closed session at the end of Tuesday’s meeting to discuss topics that included the consideration of the performance and disciplining of a board member. No action was taken after the session concluded.

7 thoughts on “As Students Return to Classrooms, School Board Again Under Fire

  • 2021-03-24 at 9:37 am

    “Parents for Education”?

    Kinda reminds me of another group, “Teenagers for Ice Cream”. What parent isn’t for education, and what teenager doesn’t like ice cream?

    • 2021-03-24 at 4:08 pm

      Well, we have Educators against Education here in Loudoun. So yeah, maybe it does make sense to be perfectly clear where one stands on a particular issue.

  • 2021-03-24 at 10:07 am

    It’s time for a new school board and probably a new county board too. I don’t know if there is a recall mechanism but it’s worth investigating. You would think the school board members involved in actual fascism would resign in shame. I’m sure our Attorney General will find much time to vigorously investigate these allegations.

  • 2021-03-24 at 12:43 pm

    The headline almost got it right.

    “As Students Return to Classrooms, School Board Again Under Fire”…… FOR NOT DOING THEIR JOB.

    We parents are trying to hold LCPS accountable since no one else is going to do it.

    Mr Zieg’s recent letters proves that he will not be the permanent superintendent.

    The other part of the LCPS Clown Show is soon to be documented criminal activities regarding an Enemies List. You can’t make this stuff up.


  • 2021-03-24 at 3:24 pm

    Teaching some kids and faculty that they are victims, and teaching others that they are privileged based other the color of their skin, is divisive and plainly racist itself.
    Critical race theory is historically inaccurate and has no place in schools.
    LCPS should stick to educating our kids and NOT advancing the goals of race arsonists like the corrupt BLM and NAACP.
    The Board of Supervisors should zero-out all budget items in the school budget related to these divisive initiatives.

  • 2021-03-27 at 10:08 am

    My mom came to this country from South Korea after she married my father in 1965. Like she said, use title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act against the leadership. Get involved, and vote these people out as well. Use every available legal means against them, let alone the use of threats against other parents for exercising free speech. They have no idea what oppression truly is, that my mom experienced, coming from Korea.

  • 2021-03-29 at 5:52 pm

    Critical Race Theory is NOT “racial sensitivity training”. Teachers who invoke CRT on minor students are themselves racist and guilty of child abuse for pitting groups of children against each other based on skin color. I understand their intentions are good, but it is very disturbing that these supposed teachers lack the critical thinking skills necessary to see CRT for what it is….even worse, these supposed “teachers” are in charge of teaching our children critical thinking skills…..THE TERM “USEFUL IDIOTS” COMES TO MIND. Historically, the term “useful idiot” has referred to a naive or unwitting ally of a ruthless political movement especially a communist movement. CRT IS DERIVED FROM MARXISM.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: